[Develop] Creating a miro package
will
willg at bluesock.org
Tue Jan 15 17:15:23 EST 2008
Ben Dean-Kawamura wrote:
> Hmm, so my plan wasn't that good. The problem is that we don't really have a
> guarentee about the "tv" directory's name. People regularly check things out
> using "tv" as the root, since that avoids checking out the binary kits. Then
> people often rename "tv" something else.
Is this a good reason to move things around in SVN? I know that I'd
like to see the bmachine stuff bumped over to a different repository.
Is there a way to structure things better so that the binary-kits are
pulled in optionally?
> So the new plan is to put the portable code at the root of the miro package.
> We can be pretty sure about that directories name. Other than that,
> everything else should be the same. This means at some point it would be nice
> to rename the "tv" directory "miro", but we can wait.
It occurs to me that the maketarball script checks out the tv/ directory
and then renames it.
Should we make changes to that for 1.2?
More information about the Develop
mailing list